Haynes v. Pipes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, where property was taken from its owner, that the “intent to permanently deprive the owner of the use and benefit of the weapon” meets 10 U.S.C. § 921(a)’s intent requirement
• circumstantial evidence that the accused did not return a firearm and did not inform the au- thorities that he took it showed an intent permanently to deprive the military of the property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).