· 4/4/2000
Haynes v. Pennzoil Company
Citations
- 207 F.3d 296
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6168
- 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,337
- 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 961
- 2000 WL 290167
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the plaintiff’s failure to apply to the open legal position in the defendant’s legal department defeated his effort to establish a prima facie failure to promote case.
- ending its analysis and affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment after concluding plaintiff “failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination under Title VII”
- ending its analysis and affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment after concluding plaintiff “failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination under Title VII”
- ending its analysis and affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment after concluding plaintiff “failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination under Title VII”
- identifying the prima facie facie elements of a failure to to promote claim
- plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination because the position he was qualified for was unavailable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Reavley, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.