Skip to main content
· 4/4/2000

Haynes v. Pennzoil Company

Citations

  • 207 F.3d 296
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6168
  • 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,337
  • 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 961
  • 2000 WL 290167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff’s failure to apply to the open legal position in the defendant’s legal department defeated his effort to establish a prima facie failure to promote case.
  • ending its analysis and affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment after concluding plaintiff “failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination under Title VII”
  • ending its analysis and affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment after concluding plaintiff “failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination under Title VII”
  • ending its analysis and affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment after concluding plaintiff “failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination under Title VII”
  • identifying the prima facie facie elements of a failure to to promote claim
  • plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination because the position he was qualified for was unavailable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Reavley, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.