Skip to main content
· 8/29/1994

Haynes v. Hamilton County

Citations

  • 883 S.W.2d 606
  • 1994 Tenn. LEXIS 260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a decision to operate a car when a reasonable person would not do so can be negligent operation
  • when car pursued by law enforcement officers injures innocent third parties, officers' decision to commence or continue pursuit can provide grounds for negligence
  • when car pursued by law enforcement officers injures innocent third parties, officers' decision to commence or continue pursuit can provide grounds for negligence
  • emergency vehicle drivers participating in high-speed chases are required to exercise due regard for safety of all persons, including third parties
  • “Proximate cause ... [is] ordinarily [a] jury question ], unless the uncontroverted facts and inferences to be drawn from them make it so clear that all reasonable persons must agree on the proper outcome.”
  • “Proximate cause, as well as superseding intervening cause, are ordinarily jury questions, unless the uncontroverted facts and inferences to be drawn from them make it so clear that all reasonable persons must agree on the proper outcome.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Reid, Drowota, O'Brien, Birch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.