Haynes v. Cochran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that prior to ruling upon a motion for summary judgment, the trial court can, in its discretion, deem expert testimony inadmissible
• stating that an expert’s opinion must be supported by “reference to facts, testimony or empirical data[;]” the expert’s testimony cannot be based on “mere personal belief”
• affirming the grant of summary judgment because the expert had failed to establish causation through the application of a “coherent scientific or technical methodology”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).