Skip to main content
· 5/19/1995

Haynes v. Caye & Company, Inc.

Citations

  • 52 F.3d 928
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 268
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11937
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,559
  • 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1755
  • 1995 WL 258629

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the company president’s statement that women are “not competent enough” to perform a job that the plaintiff desired, and was denied, was direct evidence of discrimination
  • concluding the company president’s statement that women are “not competent enough” to perform a job that the plaintiff desired, and was denied, was direct evidence of discrimination
  • “Indeed, a statement that members of a racial minority in general or women in general are simply not competent enough to do a particular job would seem to be a classic example of direct evidence.”
  • comments to female employee that “women were simply not tough enough to do the job” from which employee had been removed and that it would “require a man to do [that] job” was direct evidence of gender discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Anderson, Paine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.