Hayim v. Goetz (In Re Sol, LLC)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, despite being named in the complaint, debtor was not a party to the state court action it attempted to remove because it had not been served with process
• “[A] matter cannot be deemed to be core merely because the debtor holds a claim, which, if successful, could increase the assets of the estate.”
• “[A] matter cannot be deemed to be core merely because the debtor holds a claim which, if successful, could increase the assets of the estate.”
• “[A] matter cannot be deemed core merely because the debtor holds a claim, which, if successful, could increase the assets of the estate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).