Hayfield Northern Railroad v. Chicago, Northwestern Transportation Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• right to apportionment under state statute does not make a proposed 5 || additional party required under Rule 19
• “The defendants[’] right to apportionment of liability pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § S2–572(h) . . . does not make a proposed additional party indispensable within the meaning of Rule 19.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).