Hayes v. Watson's

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that discrimination claims under the ADEA and NYSHRL are both assessed under the same burden-shifting standard
• noting that the employees’ “positions” and the company’s “reporting structures” are relevant to the similarly situated analysis
• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over NYCHRL claims after granting defendants summary judgment as to ADEA and NYSHRL age discrimination and retaliation claims
• “A plaintiff cannot merely rationalize, explain, or disagree with an employer’s proffered non-discriminatory reasons to survive summary judgment.”
• “Where an employer replaces a member of the protected class with another member of the protected class, that fact may undermine any inference of discrimination.”
• “A plaintiff cannot merely rationalize, explain, or disagree with an employer’s proffered non-discriminatory reasons to survive summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).