Hayes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statutory change increasing permitted duration of jurisdiction retention in sentencing not applicable retroactively, because a disadvantage to defend ant
• “This provision [Article X, section 9] has been interpreted to mean that a defendant is not entitled to the benefit of a lesser sentence if the legislation reducing the statutory sentence is enacted after defendant commits the crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Glover v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-28· cited 7×
• Walcott v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-11-15· cited 6×
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. JEFFREY REININGER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-09-05· cited 5×
• Nazworth v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-18· cited 4×
• Arnett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-08· cited 2×
• Meyers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-08· cited 1×
• Owens v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-03

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weaver v. Graham
  Supreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
• Castle v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-03-17· cited 63×
• Reid v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-11-18· cited 9×
• Wicker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-08-05· cited 8×
• Hayes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-11· cited 7×
• Overton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-17· cited 6×