Hayes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that general acknowl-edgements of satisfaction with counsel do not conclusively refute claims of ineffective assistance of counsel based on a failure to pursue specific defense
• holding that “acknowledge-ments and answers of [a] general nature did not conclusively refute [the defendant’s] allegation of ineffective assistance based on his counsel’s failure to pursue a specific defense”
• remanding for an eviden-tiary hearing because the trial court did not ask the defendant specifically whether his attorney had discussed entrapment as a defense, and therefore his postconviction claim was not refuted by the transcript of the plea colloquy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fernandez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-19· cited 4×
• David J. Prestano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-17· cited 2×
• Rivero v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-25· cited 1×
• Saunders v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-19

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nelson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-12· cited 11×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-06· cited 11×
• ZANCHEZ v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-11· cited 6×