Skip to main content
· 10/17/2016

Hayes v. Sheraton Operating Corp.

Citations

  • 207 So. 3d 1064
  • 2016 La. LEXIS 2015

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering applicability of Military Pay Act even though plaintiff failed to cite money mandating statute
  • finding no “clear cut entitlement” to a promotion under Smith where an active duty service member “simply alleges that he was denied [a] promotion for which he was eligible, not [a] promotion for which he was entitled ...”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.