Skip to main content
· 1/30/1992

Hayes v. Illinois Power Co.

Citations

  • 587 N.E.2d 559
  • 225 Ill. App. 3d 819
  • 167 Ill. Dec. 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff was a direct victim because he was electrocuted as a result of coming into contact with decedent who had been electrocuted
  • holding the trial court’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint was proper where the conduct alleged could not be characterized as “extreme and outrageous”
  • distinguishing between emotional distress resulting from an intentional act, as required for an IIED claim, and emotional distress resulting from negligence
  • “The court in Rickey was solely concerned with defining the parameters of bystander recovery.” (quotation omitted)
  • “The court in Rickey was solely concerned with defining the parameters of bystander recovery.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCULLOUGH

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.