Hayes v. Hayes
Citations
- 74 Ill. 312
Syllabus
<p>1. Domicile — defined. In a strict legal sense, the domicile of a person is he has his true, fixed, permanent home and principal establishment} an(* which, whenever he is absent, he has the intention of returning. Actual residence is not indispensable to retain a domicile after it is once acquired, but is retained by the mere intention not to change it and adopt another.</p> <p>2. Same — what necessary to a change. To effect a change of domicile there must be an actual abandonment of the first, coupled with an intention not to return to it, and there must be a new one acquired, with actual residence in another jurisdiction, coupled with the intention of making the last acquired residence a permanent home.</p> <p>3 A domicile in this State, within the meaning of the statute respecting the descent and distribution of personal property, is not lost or changed by the party residing in another State owing to domestic troubles, and by his voting in such other State when its laws authorize him to vote on a residence of six months, or by his purchasing property on speculation in such State, when there is no intention of making a final home there.</p>
Judges: Breese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Maksym v. Board of Election CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court· 2011-01-27· cited 50×
- Pickering v. WinchOregon Supreme Court· 1906-12-04· cited 44×
- Douglas County v. Estate of MeyersNebraska Supreme Court· 1939-10-27· cited 36×
- Shilkret v. HelveringD.C. Circuit· 1943-11-01· cited 35×
- People Ex Rel. Noonan v. WingateIllinois Supreme Court· 1941-04-10· cited 32×
- Denny v. Sumner CountyTennessee Supreme Court· 1915-12-15· cited 23×
- Schultz v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1943-09-24· cited 17×
- Holt v. HendeeIllinois Supreme Court· 1910-12-21· cited 13×
- Kenley v. HudelsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1881-06-21· cited 12×
- Quinn v. LukanitschAppellate Court of Illinois· 1936-02-11· cited 9×
- Beedy v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1942-03-16· cited 8×
- Moffett v. HillIllinois Supreme Court· 1889-10-31· cited 7×
- Mellen v. MellenNew York Supreme Court· 1882-01-15· cited 7×
- Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1942-01-27· cited 5×
- Maksym v. Board of Election CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-01-24· cited 3×
- Butler v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1946-01-14· cited 3×
- In re Zerega's WillNew York Surrogate's Court· 1892-10-15· cited 2×
- Tobias v. TobiasAppellate Court of Illinois· 1917-10-16· cited 2×
- People v. ConnellAppellate Court of Illinois· 1888-12-08· cited 1×
- Jenks v. RoundsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1900-02-01· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.