Skip to main content
· 4/5/1965

Hayes v. Guy

Citations

  • 205 N.E.2d 699
  • 348 Mass. 754
  • 1965 Mass. LEXIS 888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing “main purpose” exception to Statute and citing Williston, Contracts [3rd ed.] § 472
  • “recovery may be had on an account annexed in cases where money is due under a contract, provided the plaintiff has fully performed his part of the contract”
  • where promisor intends to derive, and does in fact derive, a benefit to which she was not then entitled, such a benefit is deemed direct and, as such, not within the Statute of Frauds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Spalding, Cutter, Spiegel, Reardon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.