Hayes v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that a plaintiff may have asserted the subject matter of his present claim as a defense to a former action does not foreclose the maintenance of his present action on the ground of res judicata.” (citing Lukowsky v. Shalit, 110 A.D.2d 563 (App. Div. 1st Dep’t 1985))
• “The fact that a plaintiff may have asserted the subject matter of his present claim as a defense to a former action does not foreclose the maintenance of his present action on the ground of res judicata.” (citing Lukowsky v. Shalit, 110 A.D.2d 563 (App. Div. 1st Dep’t 1985))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).