Hayes v. Baldwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidentiary hearings are not warranted “when only ‘thin allegations of jury misconduct’ are present” (citation omitted)
• finding a hearing unnecessary on a motion \based on pure conjecture\
• \plain error review is not appropriate when the alleged error involves the resolution of factual disputes\
• \plain error review is not appropriate when the alleged error involves the resolution of factual disputes\
• “[B]ecause Defendant failed to raise this fact-dependent issue in the court below, he has waived it on appeal, and plain error review does not apply.”
• disparity does not violate equal protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).