Skip to main content
· 1/24/1980

Hayes v. Bailey

Citations

  • 400 N.E.2d 544
  • 80 Ill. App. 3d 1027
  • 36 Ill. Dec. 124
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 2298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where there was no evidence of how long water had been on floor, “the trial judge was correct in directing a verdict for the defendant.”
  • holding that, in a slip and fall case, “it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to establish that the foreign substance was on the floor long enough to constitute constructive notice to' the proprietor.”
  • explaining that it is not proper to submit a case to a jury where a plaintiff slips if there is no evidence of how long a foreign substance was on the floor prior
  • “[I]t is incumbent upon the plaintiff to establish that the foreign substance was on the floor long enough to constitute constructive notice to the proprietor.”
  • “the time element to establish constructive notice is a material factor [citation] and it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to establish that the foreign substance was on the floor long enough to constitute constructive notice to the proprietor.”
  • “the time element to establish constructive notice is a material factor [citation], and it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to establish that the foreign substance was on the floor long enough to constitute constructive notice to the proprietor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stouder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.