Hayden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming sentence because issue presented on appeal was not preserved for review
• providing a factual basis for a defendant who pleaded nolo contendere to the offense of robbery with a firearm and a mask that included the statement that “[o]n December 22nd, Marcus Hayden and Dantrell Riley, with a gun and masks . . . committed a robbery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Clifford B. Gandy, Jr.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2019-03-06· cited 19×
• Henderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-05· cited 2×
• Mulligan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-11· cited 1×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-11· cited 1×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-11

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-11-12· cited 84×
• Harvey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-01· cited 20×
• Capre v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-20· cited 11×
• Demps v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-10· cited 6×