Hayden v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an employee’s alleged personal knowledge of a dangerous pipeline could give rise to a personal duty under Canter
• finding that an employee’s alleged personal knowledge of a dangerous pipeline could give rise to personal duty under Canter
• finding that an employee’s alleged personal knowledge of a dangerous pipeline could give rise to Canter liability
• finding an employee’s alleged personal knowledge of a dangerous pipeline could give rise to personal duty under Canter
• remanding action where the plaintiff alleged non-diverse field foreman “had personal knowledge of the condition [of a submerged pipeline] and took no action to remove the hazard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).