· 7/22/2025

Hayden v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2574

Syllabus

On review of court of claims decision granting summary judgment to the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and denying summary judgment to plaintiff on claim of false imprisonment. Plaintiff cannot establish that he was confined after the expiration of his sentence, or that such confinement was \intentional\ or without \privilege\ based on the evidence provided, as plaintiff's continued incarceration was required under former R.C. 2929.41(B)(3). Plaintiff's claims that his parole was improperly revoked and that his continued incarceration was in violation of due process are barred by res judicata and beyond the court of claims' jurisdiction. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Beatty Blunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.