Skip to main content
· 8/16/1988

Hayden v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance

Citations

  • 122 F.R.D. 11
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8927
  • 1988 WL 96752

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Utah conflicts of law rules to decide privilege issues using the Restatement § 139 significant contacts analysis
  • considering the expectation of the parties when determining which state’s law should apply
  • construing provision stating “[t]he Contract shall be governed by, subject to, and construed according to the laws of the State of Colorado” to mean that only the agreement itself was subject to Colorado law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.