Haybeck v. Prodigy Services Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding employer not vicariously liable for employee’s conduct, which arose in part out of employee’s intent to further his employer’s business through a sexual relationship with plaintiff which “arguably encouraged plaintiff to use more [of employer’s] services”
• ‘What plaintiff fails to allege, however, is that [the employer] knew that [its employee] was having unprotected sex with customers without informing them that he carried the AIDS virus.”
• “Courts have repeatedly held that acts taken and decisions made on an employee’s personal time outside of work cannot be imputed to an employer.”
• employee’s failure to disclose HIV-positive status to plaintiff was not attributable to employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).