Hayashi v. Hayashi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \relief [under Rule 60(b)(6)] is extraordinary and the movant must show that . . . the motion is made within a reasonable time\
• noting that “relief [under Rule 60(b)(6) ] is extraordinary and the movant must show that ... the motion is made within a reasonable time”
• noting that relief under Rule 60(b)(6) \calls for diligence by the moving party\
• holding, inter alia, that \[t]he trial court may deny relief under Rule 6 0(b) without holding a hearing and may decide the issue on the basis of papers submitted\
• noting that the family coui*t did not specifically hold that the claim was barred by laches, but reasoning that the family court’s “finding was in fact equivalent to a determination that laches was a bar”
• noting-that relief under Rule 60(b)(6) “calls for diligence by the moving party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).