Skip to main content
· 7/1/1867

Hay v. Parker

Citations

  • 55 Me. 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding offer of continued at-will employment did not constitute consideration for the arbitration agreement
  • holding of continued at-will employment did not constitute consideration for the arbitration agreement.
  • holding of continued at-will employment did not constitute consideration for the arbitration agreement.
  • finding employee’s “at-will employment ... was not a legally enforceable employment relationship, so any terms and conditions placed on his employment were not enforceable at law as contractual duties.”
  • finding employee’s “at-will employment . . . was not a legally enforceable employment relationship, so any terms and conditions placed on his employment were not enforceable at law as contractual duties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Appleton, Barrows, Danforth, Kent, Taplef, Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.