· 6/6/1972
Hay v. Bruno
Citations
- 344 F. Supp. 286
- 2 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20
- 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13404
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument that Oregon Supreme Court’s decision in Thornton was a sudden change in state property law that therefore effected a taking of the property at issue in Thornton
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carter and Kilkenny, Circuit Judges, and Solomon, District Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.