· 10/15/1860
Hawpe v. Smith
Citations
- 25 Tex. 448
Syllabus
<p>If a purchaser at an administrator’s sale would take himself out of the maxim of caveat emptor, he must satisfactorily prove that the administrator represented the property sold to belong to the estate of his intestate, and that it does not.</p>
Judges: Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.