Skip to main content
· 2/21/1966

Hawley v. Virginia

Citations

  • 383 U.S. 910
  • 86 S. Ct. 894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “courts retain discretion to tailor the sanction to the violation”
  • filing “of a claim clearly precluded by the statutes of limitations ... was legally frivolous”
  • Rule 11 sanctions may not be appealed until judgment entered on the amount

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.