· 2/21/1966
Hawley v. Virginia
Citations
- 383 U.S. 910
- 86 S. Ct. 894
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the “courts retain discretion to tailor the sanction to the violation”
- filing “of a claim clearly precluded by the statutes of limitations ... was legally frivolous”
- Rule 11 sanctions may not be appealed until judgment entered on the amount
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.