California Court of Appeal· 1/10/1963
Hawley v. Orange County Flood Control District
Citations
- 211 Cal. App. 2d 708
- 27 Cal. Rptr. 478
- 1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2963
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that whether clause in construction contract providing that no damages would be available for delay was enforceable was a factual question where there was evidence that damages resulted from unreasonable delay beyond the contemplation of the parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shepard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Howard Contracting, Inc. v. G.A. MacDonald Construction Co.California Court of Appeal· 1999-01-20· cited 64×
- Ace Stone, Inc. v. Township of WayneSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1966-07-06· cited 45×
- CQL Original Products, Inc. v. National Hockey League Players' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-11-03· cited 44×
- City of Seattle v. Dyad Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-05-18· cited 25×
- State Highway Administration v. Greiner Engineering Sciences, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-07-03· cited 25×
- Yamanishi v. Bleily & Collishaw, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1972-12-19· cited 20×
- A. A. Baxter Corp. v. Colt Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1970-07-31· cited 17×
- Hertzka & Knowles v. SalterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-04-03· cited 13×
- Lubeck v. LopesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-09-01· cited 10×
- Michel & Pfeffer v. Oceanside Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1976-08-23· cited 8×
- John Burns Construction Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-09-11· cited 8×
- 11382 Beach Partnership v. LibawCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-02-23· cited 8×
- Civic Center Drive Apartments Ltd. Partnership v. Southwestern Bell Video ServicesN.D. California· 2003-11-19· cited 5×
- Harper/Nielsen-Dillingham, Builders, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-04-29· cited 3×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court· 1942-08-27· cited 343×
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-08-28· cited 119×
- Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-12-21· cited 86×
- F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1955-04-05· cited 78×
- O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-03-28· cited 74×
- Hinds v. WheadonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-02-10· cited 63×
- Pacific Lumber Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court· 1943-07-08· cited 46×
- Hensler v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-03-23· cited 41×
- Frank T. Hickey, Inc. v. Los Angeles Jewish Community CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-11-12· cited 31×
- Sawyer v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-01-24· cited 26×
- Milovich v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-01-09· cited 26×
- Sheehan v. PittsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1905-11-04· cited 24×
- D. A. Parrish & Sons v. County Sanitation District Number 4California Court of Appeal· 1959-10-13· cited 22×
- Wilson & English Construction Co. v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1934-03-09· cited 22×
- Wagner v. ShaponaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-02-25· cited 18×
- McGuire & Hester v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-09-24· cited 18×
- W. L. Waples Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1917-05-02· cited 16×
- Ross Engineering Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1940-10-07· cited 12×
- William A. Smith Contracting Co., Inc. Of Missouri, and Brown & Root, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1961-07-19· cited 10×
- Oberg v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-04-07· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.