Hawks v. Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim which had been decided against the defendant on direct appeal would likewise not be cognizable on state habeas
• holding that an issue previously decided against the petitioner on direct appeal may not again be considered on post-conviction review
• holding that claims adjudicated on their merits on direct appeal will not be considered in state habeas pro- ceeding
• holding that when a court has determined that a habeas corpus petition is repetitious then, without appointing counsel, it may deny the writ
• holding that a claim which had been decided against the defendant on direct appeal would likewise not be cogniza- KASI v. ANGELONE 21 ble on state habeas
• precluding consideration in state habeas proceedings of claims considered on their merits during direct review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).