Hawkins v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[O]biter dictum [is] sufficient to create conflict in decisions necessary to invoke [the Florida Supreme Court’s] jurisdiction.” (citing Sunad, Inc. v. City of Sarasota, Fla. 122 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1960))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bill Branch Chev., Inc. v. Philip L. Burnett, Pa
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-01-19· cited 19×
• Barrentine v. Vulcan Materials Company
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-11-26· cited 15×
• B. B. S. v. R. C. B.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-09-22· cited 11×
• Douglas v. City of Dunedin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-09-29· cited 9×
• Graddy v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
  M.D. Florida· 2017-02-14· cited 9×
• Neuteleers v. Patio Homeowners Ass'n
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-08· cited 6×
• Bbs v. Rcb
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-09-22

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sunad, Inc. v. City of Sarasota
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1960-06-08· cited 70×
• Tuggle v. Maddox
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1952-07-25· cited 25×
• Fletcher v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-05-21· cited 24×
• Proctor v. Schomberg
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1953-02-06· cited 23×
• Martin v. Highway Equipment Supply Company
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-02-24· cited 20×
• Faulk v. Parrish
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1952-03-25· cited 15×
• Williams v. Hawkins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-11-29· cited 2×