Skip to main content
· 7/1/1860

Hawkins v. Hill

Citations

  • 15 Cal. 499

Syllabus

<p>Where plaintiff has two mortgages on the same property—the property being indivisible—and one of the mortgages is not due, he may, nevertheless, file his bill and have a decree for the forecloseure of both. And if the second mortgage becomes due before the decree, then defendant cannot defeat the action as to this mortgage by tendering the money dne on the first mortgage, after the maturity of the second. The jurisdiction of the Court over the subject matter having attached, the Court should close the controversy by settling all things involved in the litigation.</p>

Judges: Baldwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.