Tenth Circuit· 12/29/1999

Hawkins v. Hargett

Citations

200 F.3d 1279
1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 85
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 34109
1999 WL 1267012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the “Eighth Amendment analysis focuses on the sentence imposed for each specific crime, not on the cumulative sentence”
explaining that the “Eighth Amendment analysis 24 focuses on the sentence imposed for each specific crime, not on the 25 cumulative sentence”
holding that Justice Kennedy’s concurrence was the narrowest
finding no Eighth Amendment violation in sentences totaling 100 years when these sentences were for combined separate offenses of rape and robbery
stating Eighth Amendment analysis focuses on sentence imposed for each specific crime, not on cumulative sentence for multiple crimes
refusing to apply increased proportionality review because a juvenile’s aggregated consecutive sentences totaled more than 100 years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Lucero, Kimball

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hawkins v. Hargett

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.