Hawkins v. Department of Health & Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• settlement resulted in consent decree that could be enforced by seeking a contempt citation for a violation
• “Where the moving party fails to indicate that it possesses new material evidence that it wishes to present to the court, an evidentiary hearing is not required.”
• “[I]t is well settled in the law that a motion for contempt is the proper way to seek enforcement of a consent decree.” (citing Johnson v. City of Tulsa, 489 F.3d 1089, 1103–04 (10th Cir. 2007); Whitehouse v. LaRoche, 277 F.3d 568, 578 n.6 (1st Cir. 2002

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).