Hawkins v. COUNTY OF BENT, COLO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing whether the FNHRA confers an individual private right sufficient to state a claim for relief under § 1983
• “This Court . . . believes that the Third Circuit’s decision in Grammer is inconsistent with the strict tests set forth by the Supreme Court . . . .”
• “To permit such self-serving testimony to suffice would set the bar ‘so low that virtually every [actual innocence] claimant would pass through it.’” (quoting Hubbard v. Pinchak, 378 F.3d 333, 340 (3d Cir. 2004))
• “To permit such self-serving testimony to suffice would set the bar ‘so low that virtually every [actual innocence] claimant would pass through it.’” (quoting Hubbard v. Pinchak, 378 F.3d 333, 340 (3d Cir. 2004))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).