Hawkins v. Brown
Citations
- 78 Kan. 284
- 97 P. 479
- 1908 Kan. LEXIS 52
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Limitation of Actions — Review of Order Overruling a Demurrer. An order pverruling a demurrer made and entered more than one year before the filing of the record in the' supreme court can not be reviewed.</p> <p>2. - Subject-matter in Custodia Legis — Suspension of the-Statute. . The fact that the subject of an action is held in. custodia legis in another action in which the defendant is not. a party nor in privity with a party, and over which he has no-control, will not suspend the running of the statute in his favor.</p> <p>3. -- Acknowledgment of a debt. An acknowledgment in writing that a debt once existed, but which does not contain an admission of a present, subsisting debt on which the party is liable, is insufficient to avoid the bar of the statute of limitations.</p> <p>4. Jurisdiction — Joinder of Parties — Process Served in Another County. A defendant who is served with summons in a county other than the one in which the action is brought will not be held bound by such service if the resident defendant was joined for the purpose of obtaining jurisdiction of the person of the former and not in good faith to recover a judgment against him.</p> <p>5. - Same. The rule above stated will not be applied against an innocent party who, in good faith and in the honest belief that his cause is just and that he has a right to recover against the resident defendant, is defeated by him upon the plea of the statute of limitations, after a full trial.</p>
Judges: Benson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Farmers Grain & Supply Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1926-01-09· cited 26×
- City of Hutchinson v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-06-06· cited 24×
- First National Bank of Topeka v. United Telephone Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas· 1960-07-02· cited 19×
- King v. IngelsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1926-11-06· cited 17×
- Tucker v. TuckerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-01-08· cited 12×
- Slimmer v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-11-11· cited 11×
- O'Donnell v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court· 1916-07-03· cited 11×
- Hamilton v. BeaubienSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-07-07· cited 10×
- Corbett v. HossSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-06-10· cited 10×
- Golden Rule Oil Co. v. LiebstSupreme Court of Kansas· 1941-01-25· cited 10×
- Voelker v. Broadview Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1938-07-09· cited 9×
- St. Louis Jewelry Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas· 1907-05-11· cited 8×
- Macksville State Bank v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Kansas· 1925-12-05· cited 7×
- Lindholm v. HeitheckerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-03-10· cited 6×
- Harbaugh v. HerrSupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-07-05· cited 6×
- Wichita Sanitarium v. BierschbachSupreme Court of Kansas· 1932-07-09· cited 6×
- Van Buren v. PrattSupreme Court of Kansas· 1927-06-11· cited 4×
- Updegrove v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas· 1938-05-07· cited 4×
- Boucher v. SteffesMontana Supreme Court· 1972-11-27· cited 4×
- Masemore v. McCrarySupreme Court of Kansas· 1929-07-06· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Marshall v. Saline River Land & Mineral Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1907-04-06· cited 18×
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas· 1907-05-11· cited 15×
- Haythorn v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas· 1902-07-05· cited 10×
- City of Kansas City v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1902-12-06· cited 2×
Other cases named Hawkins v. Brown
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.