Skip to main content
· 7/24/2000

Hawk v. Chattanooga Orthopaedic Group, P.C.

Citations

  • 45 S.W.3d 24
  • 2000 Tenn. App. LEXIS 482
  • 2000 WL 1029155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the proper inquiry as to whether amendments relate back is “whether the amendments arise out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence in the original complaint”
  • “It is clear that the bases of their dismissal motion are the affirmative defenses of the statute of limitations and the statute of repose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Susano, Goddard, Franks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.