· 11/6/1978
Hawaiian Independent Refinery v. United States
Citations
- 460 F. Supp. 1249
- 81 Cust. Ct. 117
- 81 Ct. Cust. 117
- 1978 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 983
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the Board’s authority to decide whether the FTZA authorizes a particular activity in a subzone
- noting Congress did not intend the court “to become the arbiter of permissible and/or nonpermissible intra-trade zone activity”
- “Customs territory of the United States” does not encompass statutorily excluded “free trade zone”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.