Hawaiian Dredging Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where the federal government takes a certain position in a legal proceeding, it may “be judicially estopped from taking a contrary position” in a subsequent legal proceeding
• finding, in relevant part, that Sumecht failed to show irreparable harm absent an injunction
• affirming court’s denial of injunctive relief when the movant failed to demonstrate irreparable harm
• upholding a decision by the Court of International Trade to deny a preliminary injunction based on a lack of irreparable harm even though the lower court declined to consider the other preliminary injunction factors
• upholding a decision by the Court of International Trade to deny a preliminary injunction based on a lack of irreparable harm even though the lower court declined to consider the other preliminary injunction factors
• rejecting presumption that availability of Shinyei relief is uncertain for purposes of irreparable harm in § 1581(i) actions, and also noting estoppel effect of government’s representa- tion that such relief would potentially be available should plaintiff prevail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).