Hawaii State Federal Credit Union v. Kailing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiffs payment of lower TPP payments didn’t demonstrate detrimental reliance because those payments “were just applied to the loan”
• noting borrower could not have possibly qualified for HAMP if her claim that she would not have missed payment but for servicer's \demand that she quit making her regular monthly payments\ were true [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).