Havoco of America, Ltd., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Sumitomo Corporation of America, and Elmer C. Hill, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that arguments that could and should have been made prior to judgment may not be raised for first time in Rule 59(e) motion
• explaining that a motion to alter judgment “cannot be used to raise new arguments which could and should have been raised before judgment was entered.”
• finding that plaintiff waived responsive argument when it did not present the argument during summary judgment briefing
• holding argument forfeited if raised for the first time in a motion to reconsider
• upholding the damage awards on four separate claims because the jury was specifically instructed not to award duplicate damages for the same injury
• considering appeal in underlying litigation and stating that 14 Nos. 03-1897, 03-1913 & 03-2018 arguments may not be raised for the first time in Rule 59(e) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).