Skip to main content
· 2/29/1984

Haverlah v. Memphis Aviation, Inc.

Citations

  • 674 S.W.2d 297
  • 40 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1263
  • 1984 Tenn. App. LEXIS 3389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that buyers’ claim for rescission based on seller’s misrepresentation of the quality of the aircraft sold was controlled by provisions of Article 2
  • “the UCC remedy of revocation of acceptance ‘for all practical effect replaces the old equitable doctrine of rescission’ ”
  • \the UCC remedy of revocation of acceptance `for all practical effect replaces the old equitable doctrine of rescission'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crawford, Highers, Matherne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.