Havasupai Tribe v. Robertson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff’s claims could not form the basis for agency reversal where it raised those claims after the public comment period had ended
• holding that where plaintiff did not raise claim that EIS impermissibly failed to consider effects on groundwater before agency, “such belatedly raised issues may not form a basis for reversal of an agency decision”
• noting that issues raised after publication of the final environmental impact statement were “belatedly raised” and concluding that the appellant “had some obligation to raise these issues during the comment process”
• rejecting, on the basis of government’s ownership, a Havasupai free exercise violation claim involving the Forest Service’s plan for a uranium mine in an Arizona national forest (federal property)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).