Skip to main content
· 3/3/1989

Hauswald Bakery v. Pantry Pride Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

  • 553 A.2d 1308
  • 78 Md. App. 495
  • 1989 Md. App. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claims for breach of contract and breach of an executory accord constituted inconsistent claims within the ambit of the doctrine of election of remedies
  • claims for breach of contract and breach of an executory accord constituted inconsistent claims within the ambit of the doctrine of election of remedies
  • “If the trier of fact declares for the plaintiff on both [inconsistent remedies] . . . the plaintiff will then have to make his [or her] election so that a judgment can be entered on one claim or the other, but not both.” (footnote omitted)
  • “If the trier of fact declares for the plaintiff on both [inconsistent remedies] . . . the plaintiff will then have to make his [or her] election so that a judgment can be entered on one claim or the other, but not both.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilner, Karwacki, Wenner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.