Hauser v. Simplex Window Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, notwithstanding Young, “the Eleventh Amendment bars suits brought in federal court seeking to enjoin a state official from violating state law”
• finding that without an ongoing violation of federal law, a suit against a state officer should be treated as a suit against the state entitled to sovereign immunity
• stating that 42 U.S.C. § 1383(g)(4)--which requires a reimbursement agreement between a State and the Commissioner of Social Security that satisfies certain conditions--requires entry into a “formal reimbursement agreement”
• finding that such practice does not contravene the Social Security Act
• dismissing claims asserting violations of state law alone as barred by the Eleventh Amendment
• “[T]he Eleventh Amendment bars suits brought in federal court seeking to enjoin a state official from violating state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).