Hauser v. Luhrs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding multiple inferences that could be drawn from the evidence precluded summary judgment and required a jury to determine the question of causation
• holding multiple inferences that could be drawn from the evidence precluded summary judgment and required a jury to determine the question of causation
• “The vast majority of jurisdictions with *** tolling statutes hold the appointment of a guardian does not end the disability when the tolling statute is unambiguous and does not suggest a legislative intent to end the disability when a guardian is appointed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).