Haugh v. Booker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the new statutory interpretation announced in Bailey establishes the kind of “right” needed to take advantage of § 2255(f)(3)
• recognizing that the new statutory interpretation announced in Bailey establishes the kind of “right” needed to take advantage of § 2255(f)(3)
• recognizing that the new statutory interpretation announced in Bailey establishes the kind of “right” needed to take advantage of § 2255(f)(3)
• stating that “[i]n Bailey, the Supreme Court recognized for the first time ... [the noncriminal feature of] conduct that had previously supported a conviction in virtually every circuit, thus recognizing a new right within the meaning of section 2255(3)”
• finding lack of merit outweighed the fact that claims would be time-barred if not transferred
• authorizing district court to “take a peek at the merits” to “avoid wasting judicial resources that would result from transferring a case which is clearly doomed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).