Haugen v. Kottas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding as a matter of common law that the erection of a spite fence will give rise to an action for injunc-tive relief and damages
• holding as a matter of common law that the erection of a spite fence will give rise to an action for injunctive relief and damages
• rejecting argument that remedy for “spite fence” must sound in nuisance rather than property law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).