Haug v. Bank of America, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that charging plaintiffs more for third-party services than defendant paid for them, “standing alone, does not violate Section 8(b) of RESPA”
• holding “the plain language of Section 8(b) requires plaintiffs to plead facts showing that the defendant illegally shared fees with a third party”
• noting a price-control version of RESPA was considered and rejected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).