Skip to main content
· 6/25/1982

Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 320 N.W.2d 886
  • 1982 Minn. LEXIS 1617

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that such a clause “should be given effect unless it is shown by the party seeking to avoid [it] that to do so would be unfair or unreasonable”
  • explaining that appellant did not show, for example, that the product “could not have been obtained elsewhere”
  • finding that the rules for waiver of a contractual defense, not the rules of venue and jurisdiction, govern a case involving a forum selection clause
  • finding that business corporations presumably have personnel able to evaluate corporate agreements
  • enforcing forum selection clause when “contained in an easily readable contract and consisting of only two pages”
  • declining to extend holding of arbitration clause case to forum-selection clause case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amdahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.