Skip to main content
· 8/11/1998

Hauck v. Seright

Citations

  • 1998 MT 198
  • 964 P.2d 749
  • 290 Mont. 309
  • 55 State Rptr. 838
  • 1998 Mont. LEXIS 179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “For the doc trine to apply, the new will must not have changed the testamentary purpose of the old will and must essentially repeat the same dis-positive plans.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gray, Hunt, Nelson, Regnier, Turnage

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.